Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for foundership/FrigidNinja

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was SNOW. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:22, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for foundership/FrigidNinja (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Mindless Apr 1 joke not belonging here; Wikipedia is serious. I recommend speedy delete. Rcsprinter (babble) @ 09:25, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please please please tell me you're joking. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 10:00, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think he is.... really serious about this. Mediran (tc) 04:09, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - He's not, and well done to him for stepping up to the plate, just like this admin who unilaterally nuked Example's RFA and managed to put his cojones in the fire. Remove as bloat. Humblesnore (talk) 11:24, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep until the end of the day, then Userfy to User:FrigidNinja/Request for foundership, as was done with Cyberpower678's parrot RfA. FrigidNinja 11:44, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Probably a good idea, gwickwire :) Hold it in... lol Humblesnore (talk) 12:41, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The request will of course be closed at the end of the day and the transclusion removed. FrigidNinja 14:15, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.